OPAM 2005 Toronto, ON
Home
Program
Register
Submissions
About Us
Archive
OPAM Program

OPAM Talks will be in Grand Ballroom East, and posters in Sheraton Hall

Download the OPAM Abstracts Book

Talk Schedule
Printer-friendly version
Time Presenter Title
8:15 Opening Remarks  
  Session Chair: Aude Oliva Factors Influencing Object Perception
8:20 Cate and Behrmann The unlikely percpetion of figural shape from 3D concavities
8:35 Chouchourelou, Matsuka, and Shiffrar Does emotion systematically influence visual percpetion?
8:50 Chuang, Vuong, Thornton, and Buelthoff Recognising novel deforming objects
9:05 Sadr, Troje, and Nakayama Axes vs averages: High-level representations of dynamic point-light forms
9:20 Break  
  Session Chair: Andy Leber Selection of Object Features
9:30 Davidenko and Ramscar The distinctiveness effect reverses when using well-controlled distractors
9:45 Goolsby, Raymond, and Shapiro Affective consequences of attentional inhibition depend on selection task
10:00 Leblanc, Prime, and Jolicoeur Contingent capture: A visuo-spatial effect? Evidence from electrophysiology
10:15 Burnham, Neely, Walker, and Neill Interference from irrelevant color-singletons during serial search depends on attention being spatially diffuse
10:30-11:50 Poster Session: Sheraton Hall  
12:00 Lunch  
  Session Chair: Steve Mitroff Dynamics of Object-based Attention
1:00 Fencsik, Urrea, Place, Wolfe, and Horowitz Differences in speed aid visual search and multiple-object tracking
1:15 Franconeri, Pylyshyn, and Scholl Spatiotemporal cues for tracking multiple objects through occlusion
1:30 Richard, Lee, and Vecera Effects of object-based attention: Sensory enhancement or prioritization
1:45 Gersch, Schnitzer, Sanghvi, Dosher, and Kowler Attentional enhancement along the path of a sequence of saccades
2:00 Break  
  Session Chair: Kate Arrington Object Processing in Other Cognitive Processes
2:10 Fougnie and Marois Executive load in working memory induces inattentional blindness
2:25 Singhal, Kaufman, Valyear, and Culham fMRI reactivation of the lateral occipital complex during delayed actions
2:40 Song and Nakayama Control of speed and accuracy set points in manual-pointing movements
2:55 Introduction to Keynote  
3:00 Goodale Visual routes to knowledge and action
4:00 Closing Remarks  


Keynote Speaker:
Visual Routes to Knowledge and Action
Melvyn A. Goodale
The University of Western Ontario
Email: mgoodale AT uwo.ca
http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/psychology/faculty/goodale/

   Visual systems first evolved not to enable animals to see, but to provide distal sensory control of their movements. Vision as 'sight' is a relative newcomer on the evolutionary landscape, but its emergence has enabled animals to carry out complex cognitive operations on representations of the world. In the more ancient visuomotor systems, there is a basic isomorphism between visual input and motor output. In representational vision, there are many cognitive ‘buffers’ between input and output. Thus, in this system, the relationship between what is on the retina and the behaviour of the organism cannot be understood without reference to other mental states, including those typically described as “conscious”. The duplex nature of vision is reflected in the organization of the visual pathways in the primate cerebral cortex. The dorsal 'action' stream projecting from primary visual cortex to the posterior parietal cortex provides flexible control of more ancient subcortical visuomotor modules for the control of motor acts. The ventral 'perceptual' stream projecting from the primary visual cortex to the temporal lobe provides the rich and detailed representation of the world required for cognitive operations.

   This might sound rather like Cartesian dualism—the existence of a conscious mind separate from a reflexive machine. But the division of labour between the two streams has nothing to do with the kind of dualism that Descartes proposed. Although the two kinds of visual processing are separate, both are embodied in the hardware of the brain. Moreover, there is a complex but seamless interaction between the ventral and the dorsal streams in the production of adaptive behavior. The selection of appropriate goal objects depends on the perceptual machinery of the ventral stream, while the execution of a goal-directed action is mediated by dedicated on-line control systems in the dorsal stream and associated motor areas. Moreover, as I will argue, the integration of processing in the two streams goes well beyond this. The dorsal stream may allow us to reach out and grasp objects with exquisite ease, but it is trapped in the present. Evidence from the behaviour of both neurological patients and normal observers shows that, by itself, the dorsal stream can deal only with objects that are visible when the action is being programmed. The ventral stream, however, allows us to escape the present and bring to bear information from the past – including information about the function of objects, their intrinsic properties, and their location with reference to other objects in the world. Ultimately then, both streams contribute to the production of goal-directed actions.
References:
Goodale, M.A. & Milner, A.D. (2004). Sight Unseen: An Exploration of Conscious and Unconscious Vision. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 135pp.
Goodale, M.A. & Westwood, D.A. (2004). An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14:203-211.

Kate Arrington Andrew Leber Stephen Mitroff Aude Oliva
OPAM © 2005
Design: Aaron Pearson
Webmaster: Michael Mack