|
1 |
Recognition of familiar objects is impaired by contrast reversal
Peissig, Vuong, Harrison, &. Tarr
|
|
2 |
The role of attractiveness and distinctiveness in face memory: Sex matters
Cheng & Tarr
|
|
3 |
Adult individual differences in configural and featural face recognition
McMullen, Dunham, & Dunham
|
|
4 |
Effects of expertise on configural encoding of faces
Schuchinsky
|
|
5 |
Perceptual interactions of gender, race and attractiveness
Smith, Grabowecky, Cheng, & Suzuki
|
|
6 |
The roles of shape and surface in face processing
Russell, Nederhouser, & Biederman
|
|
7 |
Sizeable costs incurred from contrast negation are unique to faces
Nederhouser, Mangini, & Biederman
|
|
8 |
Long range interactions among local competitions for figural status
Kim & Peterson
|
|
9 |
Curvature extrema and contour representation: A segment identification task
Cohen & Singh
|
|
10 |
Semantic consistency effects in object and background perception
Davenport & Potter
|
|
11 |
Functional interactions improve object detection in non-scene displays
Green & Hummel
|
|
12 |
What the visual system 'sees' during a search task in real-world scenes
Mack, Castelhano, Henderson, & Oliva
|
|
13 |
Spatiotemporal properties of contextual cueing
Ogawa, Takeda, & Kumada
|
|
14 |
The perceptual and cognitive distractor-previewing effect
Ariga & Kawahara
|
|
15 |
The role of attended objects in picture recognition memory
DiMase, Oliva, Horowitz, & Wolfe
|
|
16 |
Perceiving area in a set of random dots: Huh?
Jewell & Pomerantz
|
|
17 |
Exploring the factors influencing detection of shape changes in single objects
Chai, Nguyen, & Hillstrom
|
|
18 |
Nonverbal arithmetic
Cordes, S., Gallistel, C. R., Gelman, R., & Latham, P.
|
|
19 |
Object influences on spatial language
Kenny & Carlson
|
|
20 |
Qualitative modeling of spatial orientation processes using a logical network of necessary and sufficient conditions
Riecke & von der Heyde
|
|
21 |
Visual and proprioceptive representations in human spatial memory
Yamamoto & Shelton
|
|
22 |
Task switching and task similarity in spatial relations judgments
Arrington & Logan
|
|
23 |
Learned spatio-temporal signatures are used for object recognition
Vuong & Tarr
|
|
24 |
Multistability and biasing effects in the perception of point-light figures
Vanrie & Verfaillie
|
|
25 |
Consistency in involuntary orienting of attention to indirect cues
Bryant & Gibson
|
|
26 |
Time's up for contingency: Contingent capture explained by temporal confusion
Brockmole, Boot, Simons, & Alexander
|
|
27 |
Inhibition of return is contingent upon location repetitions
Chao & Yeh
|
|
28 |
The return of object-based attention: Selection of multiple-region objects
Matsukura & Vecera
|
|
29 |
Pigeons perform object discrimination using both local and global cues
Lazareva, Vecera, & Wasserman
|
|
30 |
Visual cues that contribute to perceiving the group center-of-attention
Morgan
|
OPAM © 2003